Ground forces This section is blank, incomplete or not detailed enough.
Your help is welcome!
Area of responsibility Army Corps of NATO in West Germany
The main front was located for the 2 alliances in central Europe. To protect West Germany , two army groups , the NORTHAG and CENTAG comprising, after the withdrawal of the French army's central command, a total of 8 Corps (three Germans, two Americans, one British, one Belgian, one Dutch) were in charge of the eastern borders.
The United States has many ground forces deployed in Europe since the Second World War. Throughout the duration of the Cold War, the 7th Army or USAREUR led forces divided between V Corps and VII Corps , the latter having been deactivated in 1991 after the Gulf War.
These forces are based almost entirely in Germany. It is primarily the 1st Infantry Division and 1st Armored Division, based respectively in Wrzburg and Wiesbaden , the 7th Army is based in Heidelberg as the V Corps.
In 2002 it was decided the foundation of CBRN (chemical defense battalion, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear) and a laboratory analysis of NBC (nuclear, bacteriological and chemical) field deployable.
Units in own
In 2009, NATO, among others, by hand, the NATO Airborne Early Warning NATO ( NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Force (NAEWF / NAEWF) created in 1982 to 3,000 civilians and military people comprising 17 AWACS Boeing E-3 Sentry (18 originally, one lost) and 3 Boeing 707 -based Air Base Geilenkirchen in Germany and the Heavy Airlift Wing (HAW ) founded in 2009 for strategic airlift, which has three McDonnell Douglas C-17 Globemaster III on Ppa airbase in Hungary.
The air infrastructure
In 1951, NATO had at its disposal an insignificant number of airfields that can implement the new generations of jets, so she launched a massive effort in this area and 220 air bases were created or developed in Europe for 448 million pounds sterling (1969 value) .
The United States Air Forces in Europe which had its headquarters in Wiesbaden , Germany since 1945 , had in 1950 , four squadrons deployed in the United Kingdom, three in West Germany and six in France, 18 000 people and 800 aircraft of all types.
The United States, engaged heavily in the Korean War from June 1950 were unable to perform as expected they are installed in Europe. Therefore, Canada had overcome this problem. It was therefore decided to create a Canadian air force performance, reserved to Europe, which consisted of four wings of three squadrons (equipped with the new North American F-86 Sabre ) each. 1 (F) Wing (Wing) was implanted in Marville , the 2 (F) Grostenquin (both France), 3 (F) Zweibrcken and 4 (F) at Baden-Sllingen (both in Germany West).
The Iceland is the only NATO member that does not have its own military force (the defense was initially provided by the United States through the base of Keflavik ) currently provide various European nations in turn permanence of air defense in Iceland . It was accepted without obligation to establish its contribution to the Alliance is doing in other forms (military bases and financial contributions for the most part).
The naval bases
The United States has deployed two major naval commands after the Second World War. This is the command of Naval Forces in Europe ( USNAVEUR ), body Naval European Command U.S. armed forces ( USEUCOM ), and the American Sixth Fleet deployed permanently in the Mediterranean since 1947 against the Communist guerrillas in Greece and Turkey.
This has given U.S. naval facilities in Europe, mainly in the Mediterranean:
List of military operations
NATO medal for personnel who served in former Yugoslavia.
- Adriatic (1992-1996): NATO engaged in a maritime surveillance operation called Operation Sharp Guard , designed to monitor the arms embargo the UN imposed on the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia.
- Bosnia-Herzegovina (1995-2004): bombing campaign to halt the conflict and first mission of peacekeeping. It was an opportunity for the Czechs and Poles to participate in IFOR and draw valuable experience, especially at the interconnection of hosts. The IFOR and the SFOR (Stabilization Force) NATO has passed the baton to the EUFOR of the European Union on 2 December 2004 : it is the operation Althea involving 7,000 men under the Berlin agreements more.
- Albania (April-August 1999): 7000 soldiers are deployed for a humanitarian operation to help refugees to Kosovo from Albania after the outbreak of war on their territory.
- Kosovo (1999 -...): after an air campaign during the Kosovo war , the Operation Allied Force , the multinational peace force for NATO in Kosovo ( KFOR ) deployed with 43,000 men. On December 7, 2004, it represents 17,733 people.
- Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (2001-2003): the force of peacekeeping, tasked with disarmament, protection of civilian observers, stabilization and securing the country. The European Union takes over 31 March 2003 : it is the operation Concordia organized under the Berlin Plus agreements.
- Active Endeavour (2001 -...): maritime interdiction operation following the attacks of September 11, 2001. The Standing Naval Force Mediterranean Sea (STANAVFORMED) is deployed to participate in the fight against terrorism. She has particular aircraft AWACS. 1200 Military affected.
- Afghanistan (2003 -...): August 11, 2003, NATO took command of the NATO International Security Assistance Force (ISAF or ISAF) is the first intervention by NATO outside the Euro-Atlantic ; contribute 37 countries and it is working to extend the authority of central government and facilitate reconstruction. Y is this a force of 45,000 men in 2008.
- Iraq (2003-2010): provides logistical support to the multinational division and participates in the training of Iraqi security forces with 300 people, including on-site instructors and schools in NATO.
- In June 2006, the defense ministers of NATO meeting in Brussels, decided to double the size of ISAF, the NATO International Security Assistance deployed in Afghanistan , currently 9,000 strong men.
The strategies of the new alliance
- The Alliance today has little to do with the Cold War. ( Jaap de Hoop Scheffer , 2006)
- Let's be clear: there can be no question of playing "world policeman". The Alliance has neither the means nor the political will. (Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, 2006)
In the multipolar world now, the role and missions of NATO are difficult to interpret. So they come out of the traditional Euro-Atlantic space. However, NATO is not intended to replace the United Nations and its structural inability to compensate. This is not a new form of troops peacekeepers. The strategies of the new NATO have been developed from the late 1990s, and developed after the attacks of September 11, 2001 on the United States:
- Washington Summit (1999): initiation of a process of turning around a NATO strategic concept directed towards crisis management.
- Prague Summit (November 2002): decision of the adaptation of the military machine to the new international situation, the concept of rapid response.
- Berlin Plus agreement (March 2003): The European Union may appeal to some NATO assets when they are needed to achieve the missions mandated by the Council of the Union.
The Defence Planning Committee decided in 2006 that NATO would be prepared to conduct two large-scale operations mobilizing 60,000 men each and six medium-sized operations (30 000 men). A total of up to 300,000 men trained and prepared will be available to respond anywhere in the world to keep the peace. NATO in 2008 is far from holding these goals if one refers to chronic difficulties of ISAF to secure the necessary means to stabilize the situation in Afghanistan (according to the criteria considered NATO as a transaction medium-sized ).
The allies pledged to spend on their defense at least 2% of their GDP to achieve a figure that only seven of twenty-six allies (including the United States, France, the United Kingdom and Turkey) reach to achieve.
In 2010 , it expects an overhaul of NATO structures with a sharp decline in enrollment from 17,000 before 2009, fewer than 13,000 in 2010 and options for the future from 9 500 to 7,500 soldiers assigned to this organization .
Partnership for Peace
The Partnership for Peace or PPP : NATO has signed numerous cooperation agreements with most European states and all non-member countries of the CIS. These are bilateral agreements and extremely flexible: each State desiring to participate in partnership decides, in consultation with Member States, the level of cooperation he wants to undertake with NATO. The primary objective is to maintain information exchange with the old member states of the USSR.
The acceding countries in PfP are:
The only European states that are not part of the PPP, in addition to micro-states ( Andorra , Liechtenstein , Monaco , San Marino and Vatican ), are Cyprus and Malta. Other partnerships generally looser, exist: it is the case for the Mediterranean Dialogue , which brings together Mauritania , on Morocco , the Algeria , of Tunisia and Egypt.
- "It is understood that each state holds above all effective oversight of its territory. As such, each state has its own geopolitical specificity. For example, Romania is a bridge between Central Europe and Southeast Europe. As such, it fights against trafficking in narcotics, organized crime , the risk of proliferation of weapons of mass destruction , even reduced its fleet is modernized and contributes to the monitoring of Black Sea and near the Dardanelles , the forces Romanian river involved in securing the Danube in agreement with other riparian states. "(Stoica Lieutenant Colonel Francisco)
- "NATO does play the role of de facto international police force in the territories it occupies? The question is actually more even if it is not its function. For example, the question arose as to the common struggle between Nato and Afghan national forces , against drug production. The role of NATO is limited to support the Afghan government. "(Jaap de Hoop Scheffer, 2006)
The Plan of Action for membership
The candidate countries participating in the NATO action plan for membership to help them move forward in the process leading to a future formal membership. These states have in fact need to fundamentally reform their armed forces, and even a certain conception of the defense:
- sustainable maintenance of peaceful relations with neighboring countries;
- Insurance inner peace by preparing a legal framework for ethnic minorities, if any;
- the chief command of the army should be in the hands of a civilian: the demilitarization of the army that puts an end to totalitarian legacy;
- generalization of the English language;
- structural reality of economic growth.
Participating countries: countries that joined in June 2004 (see above) were part of this program and the candidate countries (2008):
Candidate countries in the Plan of Action for membership:
References
- (en) Nato: reduced staff by one third? , May 11, 2010, Le Figaro
- original quote: "Keep the Russians out, the American in, & the Germans down."
- NATO against the Iron Curtain, Le Monde, 21 July 2009, page 3
- Text of the North Atlantic Treaty
- (en) Eli Corin, " Presidential Nuclear Initiatives: An Alternative Paradigm for Arms Control "in Nuclear Threat Initiative , James Martin Center for Nonproliferation Studies, March 2004. Accessed August 20, 2009
- a and b National Assembly: the censorship debate , ORTF - 19/04/1966 - 00 h 20 m 51 s (on the archives of the INA )
- Edward Cody, After 43 Years, France to rejoin NATO as Full Member , Washington Post , March 12, 2009, p. A08
- (en) Declaration on Atlantic Relations issued by the North Atlantic Council (Ottawa Declaration), June 19, 1974
- (en) See also
Related articles
External Links
Bibliography
- Anne Henry of Russian Strategic Focus No. 22, June 2010: France in NATO. The French military culture and strategic identity in question.
- Jaap de Hoop Scheffer (interview: Claudie Baran), "The Alliance is not the policeman of the world," Le Figaro Magazine, October 14, 2006, p.30.
- Zorgbibe Charles, History of NATO, Editions Complexe, 2002 ( ISBN 2870279175 )
- Lieutenant Colonel Francisco Stoica, "The reform of the Romanian Army," Army of Today, No. 273, September 2002, pp.25-28.
- Jerzy Baczynski, "To join the Alliance, Poland began to English," Polityka. Translation in Courrier International, No. 311, 17-23 October 1996, p. 14.
- Serge Enderlin , "Armies of the East: the long march toward NATO," L'Hebdo. Translation in Courrier International, No. 311, 17-23 October 1996, p. 14.
- "Security through Science", interview with Jean Fournet, Assistant Secretary General of NATO, by Maria Corrado Daclon , Analisi Difesa, January 2004, n. 42.
- "The adequacy of the strategic goals of NATO's" White Paper on Defence and National Security (Eng.) "" file prepared by ALPHA - Foundation for Strategic Studies, based in Brussels. Restricted, in March 2008.
- Lothar Schrter: Die NATO Kalten im Krieg. Band I 1949-1975 ", Berlin 2009," Die NATO Kalten im Krieg. Band II 1976-1991 ", Berlin 2009, S. 1196 ISBN 978-3-89706-915-2
Treaty Organization's (NATO) |
|---|
| States armed forces members | | |